I worked out a new voting system that,
combining the good points of paper voting with those of computing,
guarantees quick, honest and verifiable results.
Please read details at
www.ClearVoting.com
If I were in charge of the organization of an election I WOULD:
use the old traditional paper ballots
automatically enrol into electoral lists ANY citizen having the rigth to vote
Such lists whould be managed by local authorities: moving citizens would be automatically deleted
from the list of the place they leave and enrolled into the list of their new place of residence.
People would have their rigth to vote without doing anything: this whould bring more people to vote.
facilitate the act of voting
- in case many elections were held together each election would have its own ballot paper
printed on a differently colored paper.
Electors would be less confused because they could prepare at home the way they want to vote: vote X on the green
ballot paper and vote Y on the yellow one.
- print ballot paper would be as simple as possible
The shape, the colors and the quantity of printed text have a great impact on the readability of the ballot
paper: see at the end of the page a couple of examples! Properly designed ballot papere
can greatly improve the possibility people (especially disabled) have
to vote according to their true will. For istance Braille text can be "punched" under the printed text.
facilitate the access to voting
- special facilitation would be arranged for people in special situation like hill people not able to leave their
home or the ospital, prisoners (if they are allowed by law to vote), forces ...
- the day of the election would be national holiday to help working people to go to vote
- reduced transportation fares qould be available for people going to their place of residence to vote
use transparent plastic boxes to keep voted ballot papers
the public whould be able to see them all the time
scrutinize all the ballot papers into the open
choose scrutineers at random among electors
and allow candidates's representatives to
be part of the scrutiny.
allow people to record results at each polling station
so that parties can
tally them up and compare their results with the official results.
keep the voted ballot papers for several years
until the last recount (if any)
will be done
If I were in charge of the organization of an election I WOULD NOT:
outsource any of the electoral procedures to private companies
Too many people (and lobbies, and parties, and criminal and terroristic organization, and counties...) are
interested in making fraud and altering electoral results!
care how long it takes to have the final result.
Despite of all the pressure media put on electoral organization to have results in a hurry, I would take as long
as necessary: better later with certain results than sooner with uncertainty!
Democracy is not a joke or a commercial to be broadcasted within certain time limits.
an example of a very complex usa 2004 ballot paper
this is an absentee ballot: please note that many electios are on the same ballot paper
making a great confusion for the elector.
Please note the missing arrows pointing to BUSH-CHENEY is a real error
(not a joke) occurred on many ballot papers.
an example of the much simpler italian ballot paper
The site is made of several .
You can change clicking on the
or pressing the access keys
1
and
2.
Some chapters are made of several .
You can change clicking on the
or pressing the access keys
3
and
4.
Access keys are described in the
Accessibility page.
Site Map is in this
Site Map page.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Licence.
You are free to copy, distribute, display and perform the work and to make derivative works
under the following conditions: 1) You must give credit to the original author (Emanuele Lombardi)
and cite the url http://www.electronic-vote.org ;
2) you may not use this work for commercial purposes;
3) If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a
licence identical to this one.

__

__

__
This page complies with
W3C WCAG P3 but accessibility is a very difficult matter: if you find the site not easily accessible, please let me know