I worked out a new voting system that, combining the good points of paper voting with those of computing, guarantees quick, honest and verifiable results. Please read details at www.ClearVoting.com

ACCESSIBILITYa

electronic voting and Democracy

traduci in italiano

Faq

none previous chapter. Accesskey=1 none next chapter. Accesskey=2
logo of the site

electronic voting and Democracy

Faq

 

who wants us to use electronic vote?

Who is really interested in our Countries to spend Billion dollars on e-vote? Hardware and Software vendors lobbies, of course! They are infact the greatest supporters of e-vote!

As an example of what happened in US here it follows an excertp from the February 20,2004 issue of Executive Intelligence Review. Article by Art Ticknor. For non US citizen: Help America Vote Act (HAVA) is a Federal law encouraging, and even subsidizing, the use of electronic voting systems by the states.

-------------
Who Lobbied for HAVA?
Who duped Congress into supporting HAVA? Although a lot of the public-relations window-dressing was pitched in terms of enabling disabled persons to vote (a rather dubious claim), the heavy lifting was done by a consortium of defense contractors and voting-machine companies, which same group has now launched a public relations campaign touting computer voting.

The Information Technology Association of America (ITAA), a lobbying firm for technology firms, set up the "Election Systems Task Force" (composed of defense contractors and procurement agencies) to push the legislation through Congress. The major companies involved in the task force were: Northrup Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Accenture, and EDS.

During a conference call meeting on Aug. 22, 2002, it was stated that the Task Force's top agenda item was simply: "How do we get Congress to fund a move to electronic voting?" The discussion was about the importance of getting the HAVA legislation enacted as a means of creating more business opportunities for the companies involved [Bev Harris, Black Box Voting: Ballot Tampering in the 21st Century (Renton, Wa.: Talion Publishing, 2004)].

On Sept. 6, 2002, ITAA demanded that House and Senate conferees resolve their differences over their respective versions, and pass HAVA. Just over a month later, they did. HAVA was signed into law by President Bush on Oct. 12, 2002.

More recently, amid Congressional moves to amend HAVA, ITAA escalated and established a group (made up of electronic voting machine companies) to "raise the profile" of electronic voting, and peddle its "benefits" to the American public. Members of the Election Technology Council (ETC), formed on Dec. 9, 2003, are Advanced Voting Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Election Systems & Software, Hart InterCivic, Sequoia Voting Systems, and Unilect.

ITAA says the ETC builds on the work of its Voting Reform Task Group, the which lobbies for HAVA funding.
----------


 
The site is made of several chapters. You can change chapter clicking on the arrows or pressing the access keys 1 and 2. Some chapters are made of several documents. You can change document clicking on the arrows or pressing the access keys 3 and 4. Access keys are described in the Accessibility page. Site Map is in this Site Map page.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence. You are free to copy, distribute, display and perform the work and to make derivative works under the following conditions: 1) You must give credit to the original author (Emanuele Lombardi) and cite the url http://www.electronic-vote.org ; 2) you may not use this work for commercial purposes; 3) If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a licence identical to this one.


This site uses valid XHTML 1.0!__ This site uses valid CSS__ Dublin Core Metadata Initiative__ Creative Commons License
This page complies with W3C WCAG P3 but accessibility is a very difficult matter: if you find the site not easily accessible, please let me know